AUSTRALIA | Victorian Ombudsman tables Phase 2 report into disability abuse

Process must not come before the rights of the individual when it comes to the reporting of abuse in the disability sector, said Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass. Tabling the second phase report, Reporting and investigation of allegations of abuse in the disability sector, Ms Glass said the system should support the people, not the other way around.

The investigation commenced in December 2014 with Phase One tabled in June 2015 focusing on the effectiveness of oversight. Phase Two examines incident reporting and management in a range of environments for people with disability in Victoria. The scale of the problem is still unknown, but the report contains over 25 case studies to illustrate issues with the reporting and investigation of incidents of abuse.

‘What we found was that the person at the centre of an incident – the person with disability – is largely absent. Their voice is not recorded. There is a perception that it is not what has happened to them that matters but that forms are filled out and faxed within a prescribed timeframe,’ Ms Glass said.

‘Incident reporting relies on an archaic, tick box process, where information flows one way and feedback to service providers is ad hoc – so opportunities to support people individually, or to learn and improve are curtailed. What does it say about the responsiveness of this process that it relies on a fax machine?’ said Ms Glass.

Phase Two of the investigation also uncovered a deep fear of making reports from people with disability, their families and workers within the sector.

‘People with disability and their families are afraid of making or pursuing complaints, for fear of withdrawal of funding or services, or that they will not be believed. Workers in disability services are afraid to report potential abuse, for fear of reprisal including loss of shifts or intimidation by supervisors,’ said Ms Glass.

In this phase, the Ombudsman recommends the introduction of mandatory reporting of abuse to an independent oversight body, with responsibility for ensuring that allegations of abuse are appropriately investigated and lessons are learned. Recommendations also address the culture within many disability services including the wider protection of whistle-blowers and improvement to  procedures for investigation and review.

‘The incident reporting system must be made fit for purpose, and a positive reporting culture is essential. People who make allegations of abuse should feel safe, supported and confident that appropriate action will be taken,’ Ms Glass said.

‘Strong support for decision making, and ensuring that there are safety nets and checks in place to guard against abuse, are the cornerstones of a respectful and sustainable disability framework,’ Ms Glass said, echoing the recommendations made in phase one on support for advocacy and a single independent oversight body.

‘The agencies involved in recent abuse scandals have learned the hard way – and Victorians with disability have paid an unacceptably high price. People who are unable to care for themselves require the most protection. Some have advocates – people who speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. Others have no one, and it is the silence of those voices that can be the most damning,’ Ms Glass said.

Source: Victoria Ombudsman, Australia

Share this site on Twitter Shara this site on Facebook Send the link to this site via E-Mail